The adoption of drone-enabled services by organisations—whether public authorities, infrastructure operators, or private enterprises—ultimately depends on a credible business case. This requires demonstrating that the service delivers value that justifies its cost, that the risks are manageable, and that the service can be sustained over time within the organisation’s operational and governance frameworks.
Value drivers
The value of drone services is typically expressed through several drivers. Safety improvements: reducing the need for personnel to work at height, enter confined spaces, or operate in hazardous environments. Efficiency gains: faster data collection, more frequent inspections, and reduced infrastructure requirements (scaffolding, road closures, inspection vehicles). Data quality: higher-resolution, more complete, and more frequent data than traditional methods provide. And compliance: meeting inspection, documentation, and reporting requirements more effectively.
The relative importance of these drivers varies by sector and application. For infrastructure operators, safety and compliance may be dominant. For construction companies, efficiency and documentation quality may matter most. For security applications, the value is in rapid response and situational awareness.
Total cost of ownership
A credible business case considers total cost of ownership, not just the marginal cost of individual missions. This includes equipment, training, regulatory compliance, insurance, data management, and integration costs. For organisations considering in-house drone capability versus contracted services, the comparison must include the governance, compliance, and operational management costs that service providers absorb within their service delivery model.
Risk management
The business case must also address risk. Operational risks (equipment failure, weather, airspace restrictions) are managed through the governance and resilience frameworks described in earlier articles. Regulatory risk (changes in requirements) is managed through ongoing compliance monitoring. And adoption risk (organisational resistance, integration challenges) is managed through phased deployment, pilot programmes, and stakeholder engagement.
Leave a Reply